You just don't know it yet.
Six layers of compliance intelligence. One paste.
In a regulatory inquiry, "we didn't know" is not a defense. It's an admission. The question you'll be asked isn't whether violations occurred. It's why you didn't have a system to catch them.
Your team sends hundreds of communications daily. Emails, Slack messages, client memos, proposal language. Most of it is fine. But buried in that volume, right now, is language that creates liability.
Forward-looking language that reads like a guarantee. Intent doesn't matter. Language does.
Binding language without safe harbor. Unenforceable until enforced against you.
PII in an email chain. MNPI in a thread. PHI in a forward. One click from breach.
These aren't edge cases. They happen every week in every organization. The difference is whether you find them first, or a regulator does.
A junior analyst at a financial services firm used forward-looking language in a client email. No malice. No intent. Just sloppy phrasing that looked very different under subpoena.
$2.3M in legal fees. $800K settlement. Two careers ended.
The firm now runs every client-facing communication through Guardian. They've caught 47 violations in one quarter. All fixed before they left the building.
Paste any communication. Guardian analyzes it across regulatory exposure, legal enforceability, data classification, behavioral patterns, coded language, and linguistic forensics. Returns a risk score, specific findings with evidence, applicable regulations, and, when needed, a rewritten version that says the same thing safely.
Most compliance tools stop at detection. Guardian turns every violation into targeted training, personalized to the specific mistake, delivered to the specific person, with scenarios built from your actual risk patterns.
"Found forward-looking language in a client proposal that would have been a regulatory nightmare. Caught it before it sent."
"The training loop changed everything. Same people, same roles, completely different risk profile within 90 days."
The average regulatory fine is $14.8M. The average data breach costs $4.5M. Guardian costs this:
Be first to access when we launch
The question isn't whether your team will make mistakes. They will. The question is whether you'll know about them before opposing counsel does.
Guardian shows you what's really being written. Before it becomes evidence.
Generic training reduces risk. Targeted training, built from the specific mistakes your team actually makes, eliminates patterns. Guardian does both.
They do. But they also send 200 messages a day, work late, and sometimes use language they'd never use in a deposition. Guardian doesn't assume incompetence. It assumes volume.
You can't. Not at scale. Not in real time. Not with the consistency a regulator expects. Guardian reviews everything, instantly, the same way every time.
Paste your first communication. See what Guardian sees. Know what's being written before it becomes a problem.
Most teams find something in the first 10 minutes.